Main Article Content

Abstract

The oropharynx and tongue of local duck (Anas platyrhynchos), partridge (Alectoris chukar), and ostrich (Struthio camelus) were studied to evaluate the morphological characteristics that influence nutrition, swallowing, and food intake. The findings revealed that a cartilaginous hard palate constituted the roof of the oropharyngeal cavity, with the exception of partridges, that it did not have any papillae on its mucosal surface. The median palatine ridge, a prominent longitudinal mucosal fold running along the middle of the mouth, was present in the studied birds. The lateral margins of the floor and roof of the oropharynx were formed by rows of lamellae. The tongue was situated on the oropharynx floor and featured a prominent dorsal median sulcus and many lateral brush-like projections on each side of the tongue. Except for the absence of the papillae in the ostrich, other characteristics of the organ were horned lingual papillae and a bell-shaped dorsal surface height, which served as the organ's foundation. The tongues have non-keratinized stratified squamous epithelial cells on lingual dorsal and ventral surfaces, a thick layer of connective tissue containing lingual glands, nerve fibers with blood vessels, central structure consisting of the paraglossum and its related striated muscle. In conclusion, the duck, partidage, and ostrich oropharynx and tongue show particular anatomical characteristics which were morphological modulations of this part of the digestive canal as an adaptation for the feeding habits of these birds.

Keywords

Digestive system Birds Anatomy Morphology

Article Details

How to Cite
KHALEEL, I. M. ., ZGHAIR, F. S., & ATYIA, M. A.-K. (2023). Morphohistological and histochemical study of oropharynx and tongue of duck (Anas platyrhynchos), partridge (Alectoris chukar) and ostrich (Struthio camelus) birds. Iranian Journal of Ichthyology, 10(Special Issue 1), 267–279. Retrieved from https://www.ijichthyol.org/index.php/iji/article/view/980

References

  1. Al-Mansour, M.I. & Jarrar B.M. 2007. Morphological, histological and histochemical study of the lingual salivary glands of the little egret, Egretta garzetta. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 14: 75-81.
  2. Bashir, A. 1960. Iraqi Birds. Alribat Press, Baghdad, Iraq. 40 p.
  3. Baumel, J.J. 1968: Coraço evasossanguneos das aves. In: R. Getty (Ed.), Sisson/ Grossman anatomia dos animais domésticos. 5. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan, 2. pp: 1842-1880.
  4. Baumel, J.J. 1975. Aves heart and blood vessels. In: R Getty (Ed.), Sisson and Grossman's the Anatomy of the Domestic Animals. Vol. II, 5thed. Saunders Company.
  5. Baumel, J.J.; King, S.A.; Breasile, J.E., Evans, H.E. & Berge, J.C.V. 1993. Nomina Anatomica Avium. Published by the Nu;tall Ornithological Club. No: 23,
  6. Buffetaut, E.; Angst, D. 2014. Stratigraphic distribution of large flightless birds in the Palaeogene of Europe and its palaeobiological and palaeogeographical implications. Earth Science Reviews 138: 394408.
  7. Catarina, T. 2008. The morphology of the oral cavity, pharynx and esophagus of the ostrich (Struthio camelus). Msc thesis in Anatomy and Physiology Department Faculty of vet. Science of Pretoria University. 112 p.
  8. Dursun, N. 2002. Anatomy of domestic birds. Medisan Publishing, Ankara. 141 p.
  9. Dyce, K.M.; Sack, W.O. & Wensing, C.J.G. 2010. Textbook of veterinary anatomy. 4th edition. El Sevier Saunders, 350-355.
  10. Emura, S.; Okumura T. & Chen, H.2008. Scanning electron microscopic study of the tongue in the peregrine falcon and common kestrel. Okajimas Folia Anatomica Japonica, 85(1): 11-15.
  11. Freitag, S. & Robinson, T.J. 1993. Phylogeographic patterns in mitochondrial DNA of the Ostrich (Struthio camelus). The Auk 110(3): 614-622.
  12. Gargiulo, A.M.; S. Lorvik, Ceccarelli, P. & Pedini, V. 1991. Histological and histochemical studies on the chicken lingual glands. British Poultry Science 32: 693-702.
  13. Hassan, S.M.; Moussa, E.A. & Cartwright, A.L. 2010. Variations by sex in anatomical and morphological features of the tongue of Egyptian goose (Alopochen aegyptiacus). Cells Tissue Organs 191: 161-165.
  14. Hanna, J.; Kinga, Godynicki, S.; Iwasaki, S. & Meyer S.I. 2011. Functional morphology of the tongue in the domestic goose (Anser Anser f. Domestica). Anatomical Record 294(9): 1574-84.
  15. Hassan, M.S.; Moussa, E.M. & Cartwright, E.L. 2010. Variations by Sex in anatomical and morphological features of the tongue of Egyptian Goose (Alopochen aegyptiacus). Cells Tissues Organs, 000223231.
  16. Holliday, C.M.; Ridgely, R.C.; Balanoff, A.M. & Witmer, L.M. 2006. Cephalic vascular anatomy in flamingos (Phoenicopterus ruber) based on novel vascular injection and computed tomographic imaging analyses. the Anatomical Record part A 288A: 1031-1041.
  17. Humason, G.L. 1972. Animal Tissue Techniques. 3rd Edn., W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco. pp: 180-182.
  18. Igweubike, U.M. & Eze, U.U. 2010. Anatomy of oropharynx and tongue of the African pied crow (Corvus albus). Veterinarski Arhiv 80: 523-531.
  19. Iwasaki, S. & Kobayashi, K. 1986. Scanning and transmission electron microscopical studies on the lingual dorsal epithelium of chickens. Acta anatomica 61: 83-96.
  20. Iwasaki, S. 2002. Evolution of the structure and function of the vertebrate tongue. Journal of Anatomy 201: 1-13.
  21. Iwasaki, S.; Tomoichiro, A. & Chiba, A. 1997. Ultrastructural study of the keratinization of the dorsal epithelium of the tongue of middendorff’s bean goose, Anser fabalis middendorffii (Anseres, Antidae). Anatomical Record 247: 149-163.
  22. Jackowiak, H. and M. Ludwing, 2008. Light and scanning electron microscopic study of the structure of the Ostrich (Strutio camelus) tongue. Zoological Science 25: 188-194.
  23. Jackowiak, H. & Godynicki, S. 2005. Light and scanning electron microscopic study of the tongue in the white-tailed eagle (Haliaeetus albicilla, Accipitridae, Aves). Anatomischer Anzeiger 187: 251-259.
  24. Jackowiak, H.; Andrzejewski W. & Godynicki, S. 2006. Light and scanning electron microscopic study of the tongue in the cormorant Phalacrocorax carbo (Phalacrocoracidae, Aves). Zoological Science 23(2): 161-167.
  25. Khalid, K.K.; Zuki, A.B.Z.; Babjee, S.M.A.; Noordin M.M. & Zamri-Saad, M. 2011. Morphological and histochemical observations of the red jungle fowl tongue Gallus gallus. African Journal of Biotechnology 10(48): 9969-9977.
  26. Mally, B.O. 2005. Clinical anatomy and physiology of exotic species (Structure and function of mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians. El-Sevier Saunders; Edinburg London New York Oxford Phiadelphia and Louis Sydney Toronto 2005.
  27. Mc Lelland, J. 1968. Anatomy of the avian cecum. Journal of Experimental Zoology 3: 2-9.
  28. Mc Lelland, J. 1990. A color atlas of avian anatomy. W.B. philadelphia, London, Tranoto Montreal Sydney, Tokyo. 97 p.
  29. Nickel, R.; Schummer, A. & Seiferle, E. 1977. Anatomy of the Domestic Birds. Berlin: Verlag Paul Parey. 96-99 and 101-103.
  30. Olmedo, L.A.; Samar, M.E.; Avila, R.E. de Crosa M.G. & Dettin, L. 2000. Avian minor salivary glands: An ultrastructural study of the secretory granules in mucous and seromucous cells. Acta odontológica Latinoamericana 13: 87-99
  31. Pasand, A.P.; Tadjalli M. & Mansouri, H.2010. Microscopic study on the tongue of male ostrich. European Journal of Biological Sciences 2(2): 24-31.
  32. Rossi, J.R.; Baraldi-Artoni, S.M.; Oliveira, D.; Cruz, C.; Franzo V.S. & Sagula, A. 2005. Morphology of beak and tongue of partridge Rhynchotus rufescens. Ciência Rural 35: 1-7.
  33. Slomiany, B.L.; Murty, V.L.; Piotrowski J. & A. Slomiany, 1996. Salivary mucins in oral mucosal defense. General Pharmacology: The Vascular System 27(5): 761-771.
  34. Suprasert, A.; & Fujioka, I. 1987. Lectin histochemistry of glycoconjugates in esophageal mucous gland of the chicken. Japanese Journal of Veterinary Research 49: 555-557.
  35. Totty, B.A. 2002. Mucins. In: J.D. Bancroft, M. Gamble (Eds.), Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques. 5th Edn., Churchill Livingstone, New York. pp: 163-200.